Triple
T7918134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Puddy |
E183877
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipStatusWithElaineBenes |
P79760
|
FINISHED |
| Object | on-again, off-again |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on-again, off-again | Statement: [David Puddy, relationshipStatusWithElaineBenes, on-again, off-again]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipStatusWithElaineBenes Context triple: [David Puddy, relationshipStatusWithElaineBenes, on-again, off-again]
-
A.
relationshipToElaineRisley
Indicates the nature or type of connection an entity has to Elaine Risley, such as familial, social, or professional relationship.
-
B.
relationshipToBenjy
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Benjy.
-
C.
relationshipToEveHarrington
Indicates the nature or role of one entity’s connection or association to Eve Harrington.
-
D.
relationshipToMargoChanning
Indicates the nature or type of relationship an entity has with Margo Channing.
-
E.
roleOfMitchMitchell
Indicates that the specified role or function is held or performed by Mitch Mitchell.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828efbe48190bd48482650182e79 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a8fbbb48190b50def4941761a31 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae9316e98819080be7bf1a6ff92f1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69caf7882b048190baa333af9f698590 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:05 p.m.