Triple
T7909499
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Physics of Immortality |
E183660
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionInDebate |
P49860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | controversial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: controversial | Statement: [The Physics of Immortality, positionInDebate, controversial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionInDebate Context triple: [The Physics of Immortality, positionInDebate, controversial]
-
A.
enteredPoliticalDebateIn
Indicates that an entity took part in a political debate that occurred in a specified place or context.
-
B.
partOfDebate
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
-
C.
fieldOfDebate
Indicates that something is the subject or domain around which a debate or argumentative discussion is centered.
-
D.
canDebate
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
-
E.
canSpeakInDebates
Indicates that an entity has the ability or permission to speak during formal debates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828dec0c81908b8f55a4dbbb53ff |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a5c85ac81908de2ca387826ea2f |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92f9498819085277879e59aa072 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:03 p.m.