Triple
T7899230
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | bitcoin-cli |
E183406
|
entity |
| Predicate | canExecuteCommand |
P15534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | getblockchaininfo |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: getblockchaininfo | Statement: [bitcoin-cli, canExecuteCommand, getblockchaininfo]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canExecuteCommand Context triple: [bitcoin-cli, canExecuteCommand, getblockchaininfo]
-
A.
canPerform
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or capacity to carry out a specific action or function on or with another entity.
-
B.
hasCommand
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a specific command or directive applied to another entity or process.
-
C.
canBePerformed
Indicates that a particular action or activity is possible to carry out under given conditions or by a specified agent.
-
D.
mayAssumeCommandWhen
Indicates the conditions or circumstances under which an entity is permitted to take over command authority.
-
E.
containsCommand
Indicates that one entity includes or embeds a command directed at or executable by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828d13088190b222be7aa9f9315c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a2ae5048190a6824d34b582c366 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.