Triple

T7896774
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject C# attributes E183358 entity
Predicate supportsPositionalParameters P79643 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [C# attributes, supportsPositionalParameters, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsPositionalParameters
Context triple: [C# attributes, supportsPositionalParameters, true]
  • A. supportsPosition
    Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or provides backing for the stance, viewpoint, or role represented by another entity.
  • B. isNonPositionalSince
    Indicates that something has not depended on or been defined by positional context since a specified point in time.
  • C. usesPositionalNotation
    Indicates that one entity represents numbers using a positional numeral system, where a digit’s value depends on its position.
  • D. appliesToPosition
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, condition, or attribute) is relevant or applicable to a specific position or role.
  • E. supportsAt
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity in a specific context, location, or point in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828c474c8190a254d6499871eaff completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3a187a0081909a0c0822c6dab1da completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69caf7882b048190baa333af9f698590 completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.