Triple
T7896764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C# attributes |
E183358
|
entity |
| Predicate | syntaxExample |
P76879
|
FINISHED |
| Object | [Obsolete] |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: [Obsolete] | Statement: [C# attributes, syntaxExample, [Obsolete]]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: syntaxExample Context triple: [C# attributes, syntaxExample, [Obsolete]]
-
A.
codeExample
Indicates that one entity provides a snippet or sample of source code that illustrates how to use, implement, or demonstrate another entity.
-
B.
syntaxElement
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a syntactic unit or component within a larger grammatical or structural expression.
-
C.
exampleType
Indicates that one entity serves as a representative or illustrative instance of the type or category defined by another entity.
-
D.
syntaxBasedOn
Indicates that the syntactic structure or rules of one entity are derived from, influenced by, or constructed according to the syntax of another entity.
-
E.
structuralExpression
Indicates that one entity represents the structural or formal expression of another, such as a configuration, layout, or organized form that embodies its structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828c474c8190a254d6499871eaff |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a187a0081909a0c0822c6dab1da |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.