Triple
T7895851
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ECMA-335 |
E183341
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Common Language Infrastructure specification |
C7085
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Common Language Infrastructure specification Context triple: [ECMA-335, instanceOf, Common Language Infrastructure specification]
-
A.
programming language specification
chosen
A programming language specification is a formal document that precisely defines a language’s syntax, semantics, and behavior to ensure consistent implementation and usage across tools and platforms.
-
B.
version of the Unicode Standard
A version of the Unicode Standard is a specific, numbered release of the Unicode specification that defines the set of encoded characters, properties, and related algorithms valid at that point in the standard’s evolution.
-
C.
syntax specification language
A syntax specification language is a formal notation used to define the grammatical structure and valid constructs of a programming or data language.
-
D.
Unicode standard
The Unicode standard is a universal character encoding system that assigns a unique code point to virtually every written symbol, enabling consistent text representation and processing across different platforms, languages, and devices.
-
E.
formal language specification
A formal language specification is a precise, mathematically defined description of the syntax and structure of a language, typically using grammars and formal rules to unambiguously determine which strings belong to the language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828c474c8190a254d6499871eaff |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.