Triple

T7893718
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Monster E183296 entity
Predicate hasRegulatoryConcern P31131 FINISHED
Object high caffeine content LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high caffeine content | Statement: [Monster, hasRegulatoryConcern, high caffeine content]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRegulatoryConcern
Context triple: [Monster, hasRegulatoryConcern, high caffeine content]
  • A. regulatoryIssues chosen
    Indicates that there are regulatory concerns, non-compliance, or potential violations associated with the related entity or activity.
  • B. regulationAtIssue
    Indicates that a specific regulation is the subject of concern, dispute, or analysis in the given context.
  • C. hasRegulations
    Indicates that one entity imposes, contains, or is associated with rules or regulatory requirements that govern the behavior or operation of another entity.
  • D. associatedWithRegulation
    Indicates a relationship where something is linked to, governed by, or relevant to a specific regulation or regulatory framework.
  • E. hasRegulatedBy
    Indicates that one entity is subject to control, governance, or rules imposed by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828c474c8190a254d6499871eaff completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3a008fb88190a039fec40483ab93 completed March 31, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.