Triple
T7880062
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Retief |
E182954
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPatronymicName |
P79536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | false |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [Retief, isPatronymicName, false]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPatronymicName Context triple: [Retief, isPatronymicName, false]
-
A.
isPatronymicSurname
Indicates that a surname is derived from the given name of a father or male ancestor, typically signifying "son/daughter of" that person.
-
B.
hasPatronymicUse
Indicates that an entity uses a patronymic form of naming derived from a parent’s (typically the father’s) given name.
-
C.
patronymicName
Indicates that one entity’s name is derived from or based on the given name of a parent or ancestor, typically the father.
-
D.
hasPatronymicLine
Indicates a genealogical relationship where one entity’s name or lineage is derived from the father’s given name, forming a patronymic line.
-
E.
isMatronymicOf
Indicates that one entity is a name or designation derived from the mother of another entity, typically used as that entity’s family or identifying name.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828a17248190b46defe758bc5ad3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb39be7ab88190affcd353a0cd37fa |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae928e1b88190b0620f4c4f03bc7d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69caf786ec748190b6347b0c94335550 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:58 p.m.