Triple
T7874638
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hostages Trial |
E182819
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishedPrecedentFor |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | doctrine of command responsibility in international criminal law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doctrine of command responsibility in international criminal law | Statement: [Hostages Trial, establishedPrecedentFor, doctrine of command responsibility in international criminal law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishedPrecedentFor Context triple: [Hostages Trial, establishedPrecedentFor, doctrine of command responsibility in international criminal law]
-
A.
typicalPrecedent
Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
-
B.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
C.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
D.
createdInstitutionalPrecedentFor
Indicates that one action, decision, or event established a formal example or standard that later guided or constrained institutional behavior, rules, or practices for another.
-
E.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828a17248190b46defe758bc5ad3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb39a961188190b2f12f8fe5d66641 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae928e1b88190b0620f4c4f03bc7d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:56 p.m.