Triple

T7874039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Government of Equatorial Guinea E182806 entity
Predicate politicalPartySystem P19538 FINISHED
Object dominant-party system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dominant-party system | Statement: [Government of Equatorial Guinea, politicalPartySystem, dominant-party system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: politicalPartySystem
Context triple: [Government of Equatorial Guinea, politicalPartySystem, dominant-party system]
  • A. politicalParty
    Indicates that an entity is affiliated with, belongs to, or is a member of a specific political party.
  • B. politicalPartyOfGovernment
    Indicates that a specified political party is the one currently forming or leading the government of a given jurisdiction.
  • C. dominantPartySystem chosen
    Indicates a political system in which one party consistently dominates governance over time, despite the presence of other legally allowed parties.
  • D. ledPoliticalParty
    Indicates that one entity served as the leader or head of a particular political party.
  • E. politicalPartyPromoting
    Indicates that a political party actively supports, advocates for, or advances a particular person, policy, issue, or initiative.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828a17248190b46defe758bc5ad3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb39a7f1648190980db4db1a800189 completed March 31, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae928e1b88190b0620f4c4f03bc7d completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:56 p.m.