Triple
T7853549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brooks Stevens |
E182114
|
entity |
| Predicate | conceptualContribution |
P201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | planned obsolescence as a marketing and design strategy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: planned obsolescence as a marketing and design strategy | Statement: [Brooks Stevens, conceptualContribution, planned obsolescence as a marketing and design strategy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptualContribution Context triple: [Brooks Stevens, conceptualContribution, planned obsolescence as a marketing and design strategy]
-
A.
isConceptual
Indicates that something exists as an abstract or theoretical idea rather than as a concrete, physical entity.
-
B.
featuredConcept
Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
-
C.
notableContribution
Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
-
D.
introducedConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
E.
researchContribution
Indicates that an entity has produced or participated in creating new knowledge, findings, or innovations within a research context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82869ee08190b8f9040dbc2c0467 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb18ed56d481909266d862e0ae152d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92180f88190ae3d44c3de7adc93 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:51 p.m.