Triple
T7847180
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HIPAA Breach Notification Rule |
E181950
|
entity |
| Predicate | substituteNoticeMethods |
P51430
|
FINISHED |
| Object | website posting |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: website posting | Statement: [HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, substituteNoticeMethods, website posting]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: substituteNoticeMethods Context triple: [HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, substituteNoticeMethods, website posting]
-
A.
involvesSubstitute
chosen
Indicates that one entity participates in a situation, event, or role as a replacement or stand-in for another entity.
-
B.
replacesInPractice
Indicates that one entity has effectively taken over the role, function, or use of another entity in real-world application or usage.
-
C.
replacedWith
Indicates that one entity has been substituted or superseded by another entity, taking over its role, function, or position.
-
D.
mayBeReplacedBy
Indicates that one entity can potentially be substituted or superseded by another entity.
-
E.
numberOfSubstitutes
Indicates the quantity of substitute entities associated with or allowed for a given entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8285d6488190a95d4c02d7354b53 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb164105fc8190a60aaa27dd619d5a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92180f88190ae3d44c3de7adc93 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:49 p.m.