Triple
T7846186
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Form 1099-NEC |
E181927
|
entity |
| Predicate | effectiveForPaymentsMadeAfter |
P79334
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2019-12-31 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2019-12-31 | Statement: [Form 1099-NEC, effectiveForPaymentsMadeAfter, 2019-12-31]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectiveForPaymentsMadeAfter Context triple: [Form 1099-NEC, effectiveForPaymentsMadeAfter, 2019-12-31]
-
A.
effectiveFor
Indicates that one entity successfully produces the intended effect, benefit, or desired outcome for another entity or condition.
-
B.
lessEffectiveAt
Indicates that one entity has a reduced ability or lower level of success in performing, influencing, or achieving a particular action or outcome compared to another.
-
C.
decisionEffectiveDate
Indicates the date on which a particular decision becomes valid, operative, or officially takes effect.
-
D.
extensionEffectiveDate
Indicates the date on which an extension to an existing agreement, term, or condition becomes effective.
-
E.
effectiveYear
Indicates the calendar year in which something (such as a rule, status, or agreement) becomes valid or takes effect.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8285d6488190a95d4c02d7354b53 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb163f5da08190b7340ef4cc01cd19 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92180f88190ae3d44c3de7adc93 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69caf7855a3c81908b9318f7186fc0c0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:49 p.m.