Triple

T7845022
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vermont at-large congressional district E181901 entity
Predicate hasSingleRepresentativeForState P79322 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Vermont at-large congressional district, hasSingleRepresentativeForState, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSingleRepresentativeForState
Context triple: [Vermont at-large congressional district, hasSingleRepresentativeForState, true]
  • A. representativeOfState
    Indicates that an entity serves as an official representative or agent acting on behalf of a particular state or government.
  • B. numberOfStatesRepresented
    Indicates how many distinct states are represented or covered in a given context or entity.
  • C. provinceRepresented
    Indicates that an entity (such as a person or office) serves as the official representative of a particular province.
  • D. representedState
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation or depiction of the state or condition of another entity.
  • E. servesStateOrDistrict
    Indicates that an entity holds a role or position in service to a specific state or electoral district.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8285d6488190a95d4c02d7354b53 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb163d92fc8190a4efcb08d6b3d404 completed March 31, 2026, 12:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae91e98988190abd4ece75932c589 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69caf7855a3c81908b9318f7186fc0c0 completed March 30, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:48 p.m.