Triple
T7829917
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manchester Arena Inquiry |
E181339
|
entity |
| Predicate | examined |
P78590
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Greater Manchester Police response |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greater Manchester Police response | Statement: [Manchester Arena Inquiry, examined, Greater Manchester Police response]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: examined Context triple: [Manchester Arena Inquiry, examined, Greater Manchester Police response]
-
A.
considered
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
B.
consulted
Indicates that one entity sought advice, information, or guidance from another entity.
-
C.
explored
Indicates that an entity has traveled through, examined, or investigated another entity or area, typically to discover or learn more about it.
-
D.
examinedIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity is analyzed, inspected, or studied within the context, scope, or setting provided by another entity.
-
E.
exposed
Indicates that one entity has been made visible, revealed, or left unprotected to another entity or to some external influence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8282ccec819083c48efb72d21cf9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb04ac013c81909533fa348776f50c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae91ae008819098e56bbe51143b31 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:44 p.m.