Triple
T7808689
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | York County government |
E180622
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJurisdictionOver |
P808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | York County |
unclear NED1
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: York County | Statement: [York County government, hasJurisdictionOver, York County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: York County Context triple: [York County government, hasJurisdictionOver, York County]
-
A.
York County
York County is a county in northern South Carolina that forms part of the greater Charlotte metropolitan region.
-
B.
York County
York County is a county in southeastern Virginia that forms part of the Hampton Roads metropolitan region along the Chesapeake Bay.
-
C.
York County
York County is a coastal county in southwestern Maine known for its historic towns, beaches, and role as one of the state's earliest settled regions.
-
D.
Page County
Page County is a rural county in southwestern Iowa known for its agricultural landscape and small communities.
-
E.
Carlisle County
Carlisle County is a rural county in far western Kentucky, United States, known for its agricultural landscape and location within the Jackson Purchase region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide. chosen
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca827f6f148190beca4e245b993506 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69caf78a6d88819093f83528fe88b182 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cb5a4724288190b6f18f8cdde080ed |
completed | March 31, 2026, 5:23 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:36 p.m.