Triple

T7803961
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flag of Nuevo León E180500 entity
Predicate containsHeraldicShield P61212 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Flag of Nuevo León, containsHeraldicShield, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsHeraldicShield
Context triple: [Flag of Nuevo León, containsHeraldicShield, yes]
  • A. hasHeraldicShieldShape
    Indicates that an entity’s heraldic shield is characterized by a specific geometric or stylistic shape.
  • B. hasHeraldicSubject
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic subject or emblematic figure depicted on another entity, such as on a coat of arms or shield.
  • C. hasHeraldicRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or is assigned a specific role or function within a heraldic context (such as in coats of arms, armorial bearings, or heraldic ceremonies).
  • D. hasHeraldicAttitude
    Indicates that an entity (typically an animal or figure in heraldry) is depicted with a specific standardized posture or stance in a coat of arms.
  • E. hasHeraldicUse chosen
    Indicates that something is used as, or incorporated into, a heraldic device, emblem, or coat of arms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca827e50cc8190a92a733577184938 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69caf78a6d88819093f83528fe88b182 completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9111b2481909684a2d4aa4831c2 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:34 p.m.