Triple

T7803311
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Atlético de Kolkata E180483 entity
Predicate secondaryLanguageOfFanbase P27353 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Atlético de Kolkata, secondaryLanguageOfFanbase, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondaryLanguageOfFanbase
Context triple: [Atlético de Kolkata, secondaryLanguageOfFanbase, English]
  • A. languageOfFanbase
    Indicates the primary language or languages commonly used by a fanbase in its communication and expression.
  • B. primaryLanguageSide2
    Indicates that the second entity in the relationship uses or is associated with the primary language specified.
  • C. laterSecondaryLanguageOfAdministration
    Indicates that one language served as a subsequent or later secondary language used for administrative purposes in relation to another language.
  • D. hasSecondaryLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses or uses a secondary language in addition to its primary language.
  • E. secondLanguageSpeakers chosen
    Indicates that the referenced language is spoken as a second (non-native) language by the specified group or number of people.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca827e50cc8190a92a733577184938 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69caf78a6d88819093f83528fe88b182 completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9111b2481909684a2d4aa4831c2 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:34 p.m.