Triple
T7802494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agostini v. Felton |
E180462
|
entity |
| Predicate | testApplied |
P17991
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lemon test |
E32822
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lemon test | Statement: [Agostini v. Felton, testApplied, Lemon test]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lemon test Context triple: [Agostini v. Felton, testApplied, Lemon test]
-
A.
Lemon test
chosen
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
B.
Oakes test
The Oakes test is a legal framework used by Canadian courts to determine whether a law that limits Charter rights can be justified as a reasonable and demonstrably justified restriction in a free and democratic society.
-
C.
Noerr-Pennington doctrine
The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
-
D.
Jacobellis v. Ohio
Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
-
E.
Roth test for obscenity
The Roth test for obscenity is a legal standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca827e50cc8190a92a733577184938 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cae988bc2081909870bae1c2e9c238 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cb14371e2081908d0a798d3b785c3c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:33 p.m.