Triple
T7788386
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amaravati |
E187306
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedJudicialFunction |
P32953
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial capital of Andhra Pradesh |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial capital of Andhra Pradesh | Statement: [Amaravati, proposedJudicialFunction, judicial capital of Andhra Pradesh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedJudicialFunction Context triple: [Amaravati, proposedJudicialFunction, judicial capital of Andhra Pradesh]
-
A.
hadJudicialFunction
chosen
Indicates that an entity exercised or was assigned an official judicial role, authority, or responsibility in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
judicialRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
-
C.
courtRole
Indicates the specific capacity or position an entity holds within a court proceeding or judicial context.
-
D.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
E.
judiciaryAct
Indicates that an entity is involved in, established by, or otherwise directly related to a specific judiciary act or piece of judicial legislation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82af2d2c8190963861f5e0b8bf21 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cae7e8a0d08190b6d4ca560681eb35 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69caa488532c819093ac40bba0b3c7ef |
completed | March 30, 2026, 4:27 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:24 p.m.