Triple

T7778131
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quai des Orfèvres E221444 entity
Predicate hasNotableNumber P78943 FINISHED
Object 36 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 36 | Statement: [Quai des Orfèvres, hasNotableNumber, 36]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableNumber
Context triple: [Quai des Orfèvres, hasNotableNumber, 36]
  • A. hasNotableMetric
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific metric or measurement that is considered significant or noteworthy in its context.
  • B. hasNotableContender
    Indicates that an entity has a significant rival, challenger, or competitor recognized as noteworthy in relation to it.
  • C. hasNotableSubject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
  • D. hasNotableWord
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a word or term that is considered notable, distinctive, or significant in some context.
  • E. hasNotableResponse
    Indicates that an entity has received a significant, noteworthy, or widely recognized reaction or feedback in response to it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83ebbef881909ac47f789145fef7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cae7e779ec8190b77296d9c2ac3210 completed March 30, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69caa488532c819093ac40bba0b3c7ef completed March 30, 2026, 4:27 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cae7e47c5c8190bca90d45b3cdc25e completed March 30, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:16 p.m.