Triple

T7765788
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Henry Cockburn, Lord Cockburn E176140 entity
Predicate appointedLordOfSession P71782 FINISHED
Object 1834 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1834 | Statement: [Henry Cockburn, Lord Cockburn, appointedLordOfSession, 1834]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedLordOfSession
Context triple: [Henry Cockburn, Lord Cockburn, appointedLordOfSession, 1834]
  • A. appointedIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity is formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or office within a specific context, organization, or jurisdiction.
  • B. appointedFrom
    Indicates that an entity was selected or assigned to a position or role originating from a specified source, body, or prior position.
  • C. appointedWith
    Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • D. appointedAfter
    Indicates that one entity was appointed to a position or role at a later time than another entity.
  • E. appointedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been formally selected or assigned to a position, role, or office by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69962923c8190ac74d28b4f9fe0a0 completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c7043279748190b30882e9cc6cca54 completed March 27, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c7016f4ce881909c2e9f610255187b completed March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:09 p.m.