Triple
T7756059
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York City mayoral elections |
E175897
|
entity |
| Predicate | allowsFusionVoting |
P78536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [New York City mayoral elections, allowsFusionVoting, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsFusionVoting Context triple: [New York City mayoral elections, allowsFusionVoting, yes]
-
A.
allowsPreferenceVotes
Indicates that an entity permits the use of preference-based or ranked-choice voting in a given context.
-
B.
votingControl
Indicates that one entity has the power to determine or significantly influence the outcome of decisions made by another entity through its voting rights.
-
C.
usesVotingDiscipline
Indicates that an entity follows or enforces a coordinated pattern of voting behavior, typically aligning votes according to a shared strategy, rule, or group directive.
-
D.
requiresAbstentionFrom
Indicates that one entity imposes or necessitates refraining from a specific action, behavior, or substance by another entity.
-
E.
hasVoteSplit
Indicates that a collective decision or vote resulted in differing choices among participants rather than unanimous agreement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6996180088190832e38e8d83ff54a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c705257ca08190a78c592a1e616da8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7016df2b08190b2330a2010691431 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c70524c3948190a163dc5f4ecdffa7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m.