Triple

T7754437
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CSA-LINES E175854 entity
Predicate languageOfPronunciation P27691 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [CSA-LINES, languageOfPronunciation, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfPronunciation
Context triple: [CSA-LINES, languageOfPronunciation, English]
  • A. pronunciationLanguage chosen
    Indicates the language in which the pronunciation of an entity (such as a word or name) is given.
  • B. hasStandardPronunciationBasedOn
    Indicates that one entity’s standard or canonical pronunciation is determined or derived from another entity’s pronunciation.
  • C. isSpokenAs
    Indicates that one entity is used as the spoken or verbal form of another entity (e.g., a word, name, or phrase).
  • D. typeOfPronunciationDescribed
    Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the kind or style of pronunciation associated with another entity.
  • E. isMorePronouncedIn
    Indicates that a particular feature, quality, or effect appears with greater intensity or prominence in one context, entity, or condition than in another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6996180088190832e38e8d83ff54a completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c705257ca08190a78c592a1e616da8 completed March 27, 2026, 10:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c7016df2b08190b2330a2010691431 completed March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m.