Triple
T775148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz |
E16370
|
entity |
| Predicate | coInventorOf |
P1858
|
FINISHED |
| Object | infinitesimal calculus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: infinitesimal calculus | Statement: [Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, coInventorOf, infinitesimal calculus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coInventorOf Context triple: [Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, coInventorOf, infinitesimal calculus]
-
A.
coInventorWith
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities jointly invented or created the same invention.
-
B.
wasInventedBy
Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
-
C.
notableInventor
Indicates that the subject is a well-known or historically significant inventor of the object.
-
D.
discoveredBy
Indicates that something was found, identified, or brought to light through the efforts or actions of a particular agent.
-
E.
patentHolder
Indicates that one entity legally owns the rights granted by a specific patent associated with another entity or invention.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49369a0848190af883934cee3db4c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a74da7648190adfad56717d564df |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a50a443481909ae3662764ee69a4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.