Triple
T7743407
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Karenni State |
E175563
|
entity |
| Predicate | autonomyDemand |
P78446
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federalism | Statement: [Karenni State, autonomyDemand, federalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: autonomyDemand Context triple: [Karenni State, autonomyDemand, federalism]
-
A.
grantsOfAutonomy
Indicates that one entity confers a degree of self-governance, independence, or decision-making authority to another entity.
-
B.
autonomyStatus
Indicates the degree to which an entity operates independently or with self-governed control, without external direction or intervention.
-
C.
hasAutonomyWithin
Indicates that one entity possesses independent decision-making power or self-governance within the scope, domain, or boundaries defined by another entity.
-
D.
hasLimitedAutonomyIn
Indicates that an entity operates or makes decisions within a domain where its freedom of action is constrained or controlled by another entity or governing context.
-
E.
hasAutonomyReason
Indicates that an entity has a specific reason or justification for its autonomy or independent decision-making.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995f9c60819092e386192bd63c6f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c70402169481909b219dc5f4a64b9b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7016c4a748190a7012030edaefcee |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c7040091608190a9e46ecfb2ff0bca |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:07 p.m.