Triple
T7743231
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pwo Karen people |
E175560
|
entity |
| Predicate | language |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pwo Karen language |
E175559
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pwo Karen language | Statement: [Pwo Karen people, language, Pwo Karen language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pwo Karen language Context triple: [Pwo Karen people, language, Pwo Karen language]
-
A.
Pwo Karen language
chosen
Pwo Karen language is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Pwo subgroup of the Karen people in Myanmar and neighboring regions.
-
B.
Bwe Karen language
Bwe Karen language is a Karenic language of the Sino-Tibetan family spoken by the Bwe Karen ethnic group in Myanmar.
-
C.
Sgaw Karen language
Sgaw Karen language is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Sgaw Karen people of Myanmar and Thailand, using its own script and serving as a key marker of Karen cultural identity.
-
D.
Pa’O language
The Pa’O language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken primarily by the Pa’O (Taungthu) people of Myanmar, especially in Shan and Kayin States.
-
E.
Pokomo language
The Pokomo language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Pokomo people along Kenya’s Tana River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995f9c60819092e386192bd63c6f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c70388d58081909aad2c03b4501e78 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:24 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c8be48d61c8190aba1e5f23d7cb1be |
completed | March 29, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:07 p.m.