Triple
T7716373
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intel 8008 |
E174894
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresSupportChips |
P78306
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Intel 8008, requiresSupportChips, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresSupportChips Context triple: [Intel 8008, requiresSupportChips, yes]
-
A.
tieneSoporte
Indicates that one entity provides support, backing, or a supporting structure for another entity.
-
B.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
C.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
D.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
E.
displayChip
Indicates that one entity presents or renders another entity as a chip-style visual element in a user interface.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995c463c8190a14458036249d419 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c702ebb7448190ae8d47fe0cbb0907 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c701683dec8190be9861e592aa8ce0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c702e9a32081909a153190a62af426 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:04 p.m.