Triple
T7711862
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alasdair Roberts |
E174778
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasIndependentLabelReleases |
P78282
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Alasdair Roberts, hasIndependentLabelReleases, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIndependentLabelReleases Context triple: [Alasdair Roberts, hasIndependentLabelReleases, true]
-
A.
hasRecordLabel
Indicates that an entity (typically a musical artist or release) is associated with or signed to a particular record label.
-
B.
hasDiscographyWith
Indicates a relationship where two or more musical entities are associated through a shared or jointly produced discography.
-
C.
hasDiscographyIn
Indicates that an entity has released or contributed to musical recordings within a particular region, market, or catalog context.
-
D.
hasTributeReleasesFor
Indicates that one entity has released or produced tribute works (such as albums, songs, or performances) dedicated to another entity.
-
E.
ownedRecordLabel
Indicates that one entity previously possessed legal ownership or controlling interest in a particular record label.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995c463c8190a14458036249d419 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c702ebb7448190ae8d47fe0cbb0907 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c701683dec8190be9861e592aa8ce0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c702e9a32081909a153190a62af426 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:04 p.m.