Triple
T7702916
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GPC |
E174542
|
entity |
| Predicate | warningLabelRequired |
P78373
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [GPC, warningLabelRequired, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: warningLabelRequired Context triple: [GPC, warningLabelRequired, yes]
-
A.
warningIssued
Indicates that a formal warning or alert has been communicated from one entity to another regarding a potential or existing risk, problem, or violation.
-
B.
requiresCautionIn
Indicates that engaging with or operating within the referenced context, situation, or environment demands heightened care, attention, or precaution.
-
C.
requiredBy
Indicates that one entity depends on or cannot function properly without another entity being present, completed, or satisfied.
-
D.
warningType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a warning associated with an entity or event.
-
E.
warningCall
Indicates that one entity initiates a call to another specifically to warn them about a danger, risk, or important cautionary information.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995a72cc8190998e56daa6f8e453 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c70402169481909b219dc5f4a64b9b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c70165e78c8190bf6b3c34e243cb81 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c7040091608190a9e46ecfb2ff0bca |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:03 p.m.