Triple
T7676354
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Karenic languages |
E173869
|
entity |
| Predicate | areTonal |
P12025
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Karenic languages, areTonal, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areTonal Context triple: [Karenic languages, areTonal, true]
-
A.
tonal
Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
-
B.
tonalCharacteristic
Indicates the specific quality or character of a sound’s tone, such as its color, texture, or expressive nuance, in relation to an entity.
-
C.
tonalCenter
Indicates that one musical element functions as the primary pitch or key center around which another musical element is organized.
-
D.
marksTones
Indicates that one entity applies or denotes tonal markings or distinctions on another entity, such as in language or notation.
-
E.
hasPhonemicTone
chosen
Indicates that a language, word, or syllable uses pitch differences (tones) as phonemic contrasts that can change meaning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995703e0819081de77361b602e78 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7048b0b448190889bd40e0a38e51a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c701618d3481908be84b76f36ac5a1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:01 p.m.