Triple
T7666082
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NP-completeness |
E173625
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalProofMethod |
P27215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | polynomial-time reduction from known NP-complete problem |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: polynomial-time reduction from known NP-complete problem | Statement: [NP-completeness, typicalProofMethod, polynomial-time reduction from known NP-complete problem]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalProofMethod Context triple: [NP-completeness, typicalProofMethod, polynomial-time reduction from known NP-complete problem]
-
A.
typicalProofUses
chosen
Indicates that a proof characteristically or commonly employs a particular method, technique, or component.
-
B.
hasAlternativeProofMethod
Indicates that there exists a different proof technique or approach that can be used to establish the same result or theorem.
-
C.
usedInProofStyle
Indicates that one entity is employed as a method, technique, or approach within the proof style or strategy of another entity.
-
D.
hasProofMethod
Indicates that there exists a specific method or technique used to establish or demonstrate the validity of something (such as a statement, claim, or theorem).
-
E.
proved
Indicates that one entity has demonstrated the truth or validity of another entity (such as a statement, theorem, or claim) through logical or evidential means.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c699562484819086752091e3164a27 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7063dab1881909598b04999b8b690 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7015f7430819099d3ea2781b7cee2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4 p.m.