Triple

T7665661
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Interpreter E173616 entity
Predicate contextHolds P78658 FINISHED
Object Input string or tokens LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Input string or tokens | Statement: [Interpreter, contextHolds, Input string or tokens]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contextHolds
Context triple: [Interpreter, contextHolds, Input string or tokens]
  • A. context
    Indicates that one entity provides the surrounding circumstances, setting, or background within which another entity, event, or statement occurs or is interpreted.
  • B. contextOf
    Indicates that one entity provides the situational, informational, or environmental background within which another entity exists, occurs, or is interpreted.
  • C. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • D. holdsUnder
    Indicates that one entity maintains possession, control, or validity of another entity subject to certain conditions, constraints, or a specific context.
  • E. canonicalContext
    Indicates the standard or primary contextual framework within which an entity, statement, or resource is to be interpreted.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c699562484819086752091e3164a27 completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c7063dab1881909598b04999b8b690 completed March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c7015f7430819099d3ea2781b7cee2 completed March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c7063cfd78819095c6501fe8d57312 completed March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4 p.m.