Triple
T7665593
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Command |
E173615
|
entity |
| Predicate | ConcreteCommand |
P78655
|
FINISHED |
| Object | binds a Receiver to an action |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binds a Receiver to an action | Statement: [Command, ConcreteCommand, binds a Receiver to an action]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ConcreteCommand Context triple: [Command, ConcreteCommand, binds a Receiver to an action]
-
A.
coCommandedWith
Indicates that two or more entities shared command authority together over the same unit, operation, or context during a given period.
-
B.
commandOf
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or leadership over another, typically in a military, organizational, or hierarchical context.
-
C.
coreCommand
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or central command or control authority over another entity or process.
-
D.
centralCommand
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary controlling or coordinating authority over the operations, decisions, or activities of another entity or group.
-
E.
commands
Indicates that one entity holds authority over another and issues directives or orders that the other is expected to follow.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c699562484819086752091e3164a27 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7063dab1881909598b04999b8b690 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7015f7430819099d3ea2781b7cee2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c7063cfd78819095c6501fe8d57312 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4 p.m.