Triple

T7660953
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kolami–Naiki subgroup E173503 entity
Predicate hasMember P10 FINISHED
Object Naiki language E590956 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Naiki language | Statement: [Kolami–Naiki subgroup, hasMember, Naiki language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Naiki language
Context triple: [Kolami–Naiki subgroup, hasMember, Naiki language]
  • A. Naiki language chosen
    The Naiki language is a Dravidian tribal language of central India, spoken by communities closely related linguistically and culturally to Gondi-speaking groups.
  • B. Nakanai language
    The Nakanai language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Nakanai people of New Britain in Papua New Guinea.
  • C. Batui language
    The Batui language is an Austronesian language spoken in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, and is part of the Saluan–Banggai subgroup.
  • D. Sekani language
    The Sekani language is an Indigenous Northern Athabaskan language spoken by the Sekani people of north-central British Columbia, Canada.
  • E. Baniwa language
    Baniwa is an Arawakan Indigenous language spoken primarily along the Rio Negro in northwestern Brazil, as well as in parts of Colombia and Venezuela.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69955517c819085bc715b96d304d2 completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c701a47a5c8190867e39f552c86787 completed March 27, 2026, 10:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c89b14b6848190892a262903d78b79 completed March 29, 2026, 3:23 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:59 p.m.