Triple

T7625109
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nantan E172607 entity
Predicate hasTraditionalCulturalSites P78176 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Nantan, hasTraditionalCulturalSites, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalCulturalSites
Context triple: [Nantan, hasTraditionalCulturalSites, true]
  • A. hasCulturalSiteType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of cultural site.
  • B. culturalSite
    Indicates that one entity is recognized or designated as a cultural site associated with or located in relation to another entity.
  • C. isCulturalHeritageSite
    Indicates that a place or structure is officially recognized and protected as having significant cultural, historical, or artistic value.
  • D. culturalHeritageOf
    Indicates that something serves as the cultural heritage belonging to, originating from, or strongly associated with a particular entity or group.
  • E. hasUNESCOCandidateSite
    Indicates that an entity possesses or includes at least one site that is a candidate for inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c699517e348190bd3348b6889200f2 completed March 27, 2026, 2:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6fe73ff7c8190ab1218d97b37416d completed March 27, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4e725a88190b1f05dd224f7f4f2 completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6fe7323b0819081664662d2f26937 completed March 27, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:56 p.m.