Triple

T7600604
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject quark model E179971 entity
Predicate usesSymmetry P12998 FINISHED
Object SU(3) flavor symmetry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SU(3) flavor symmetry | Statement: [quark model, usesSymmetry, SU(3) flavor symmetry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSymmetry
Context triple: [quark model, usesSymmetry, SU(3) flavor symmetry]
  • A. usesSymmetryGroup chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
  • B. testsSymmetry
    Indicates that one entity evaluates or verifies whether a relationship or property holds identically in both directions between two entities.
  • C. isSymmetric
    Indicates that a relationship holds in both directions between two entities, so if it applies from A to B, it also applies from B to A.
  • D. isSymmetricAbout
    Indicates that one entity is a mirror image of another with respect to a specified axis, point, or plane of symmetry.
  • E. hasExchangeSymmetry
    Indicates that a relationship or configuration remains unchanged when the positions or roles of the involved entities are interchanged.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f3487ec8190bf7acdf2dd91e6d6 completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f9d9c55c8190841f3bf3225c096a completed March 27, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4e2e42c8190afc802c4796c9cc2 completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:53 p.m.