Triple
T7600539
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Omega minus baryon |
E179970
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsValenceQuark |
P23054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strange quark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strange quark | Statement: [Omega minus baryon, containsValenceQuark, strange quark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsValenceQuark Context triple: [Omega minus baryon, containsValenceQuark, strange quark]
-
A.
hasValenceQuarks
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses the specified quarks as its constituent valence quarks.
-
B.
hasAntiquark
Indicates that one particle is associated with, or contains, a corresponding antiquark as part of its composition or structure.
-
C.
hasQuarkFlavors
Indicates that an entity (such as a particle) possesses specific types (flavors) of quarks as its constituents.
-
D.
hasValley
Indicates that one entity contains, features, or is characterized by the presence of a valley associated with the other entity.
-
E.
hasChargeConjugation
Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f3487ec8190bf7acdf2dd91e6d6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f9d9c55c8190841f3bf3225c096a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f4e2e42c8190afc802c4796c9cc2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:53 p.m.