Triple

T7581993
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act E179508 entity
Predicate replacedByDoctrine P77990 FINISHED
Object imminent lawless action standard for incitement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imminent lawless action standard for incitement | Statement: [Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act, replacedByDoctrine, imminent lawless action standard for incitement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacedByDoctrine
Context triple: [Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act, replacedByDoctrine, imminent lawless action standard for incitement]
  • A. usesDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or relies on a particular doctrine in its actions or reasoning.
  • B. containsDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity includes, embodies, or incorporates the doctrine, principles, or teachings represented by another entity.
  • C. createdDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity originated, formulated, or established a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles.
  • D. citedForDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity is cited as an authoritative source or precedent for a particular doctrine, principle, or rule in relation to another entity.
  • E. developedDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f327db881909a21ae3b156f8ded completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f978341081909e009c410ffc5039 completed March 27, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4e04c2c8190a889d928515d9b8e completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f8184bb08190b2f70545a6aa277c completed March 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:52 p.m.