Triple

T7566504
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Schooneveld E178925 entity
Predicate attackingSide P39750 FINISHED
Object Anglo-French fleet LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anglo-French fleet | Statement: [Battle of Schooneveld, attackingSide, Anglo-French fleet]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attackingSide
Context triple: [Battle of Schooneveld, attackingSide, Anglo-French fleet]
  • A. attackerSide chosen
    Indicates which party or faction is responsible for carrying out an attack in a conflict or violent incident.
  • B. monarchOfAttackingSide
    Indicates that the subject is the reigning monarch who leads or represents the attacking side in a conflict or confrontation.
  • C. attackedFrom
    Indicates that one entity initiated an attack against another entity originating from a specific source location or position.
  • D. mainAttacker
    Indicates that an entity is the primary or leading aggressor responsible for initiating or carrying out an attack against another entity.
  • E. opponentCommanderSide
    Indicates that one commander is positioned on the opposing side relative to another commander in a conflict or competitive scenario.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f2f80288190b95cceb4da92ab2b completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f8fde87c81909795fc713d7378ff completed March 27, 2026, 9:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4dc485c819080da13e3b7f4f08f completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:50 p.m.