Triple
T7561843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Athenagoras of Athens |
E178810
|
entity |
| Predicate | apologeticTheme |
P77622
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defense of Christians against charges of atheism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense of Christians against charges of atheism | Statement: [Athenagoras of Athens, apologeticTheme, defense of Christians against charges of atheism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: apologeticTheme Context triple: [Athenagoras of Athens, apologeticTheme, defense of Christians against charges of atheism]
-
A.
apologeticMethod
Indicates the manner or approach by which an apology is expressed or delivered from one entity to another.
-
B.
apologeticWork
Indicates that a work expresses apology, remorse, or regret toward someone or something.
-
C.
apologizedFor
Indicates that one entity expressed regret or remorse to another entity specifically about a particular action, event, or wrongdoing.
-
D.
apologyIssued
Indicates that one entity has expressed regret or remorse to another entity for a perceived wrong, mistake, or offense.
-
E.
typeOfApology
Indicates that one entity specifies the particular kind or category of apology expressed in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f2f80288190b95cceb4da92ab2b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f8f994a48190b8338654d6777654 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f4dc485c819080da13e3b7f4f08f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6f59517648190ac0a9e9cba045dd5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:50 p.m.