Triple

T7558750
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CC E178739 entity
Predicate associatedSubdivisionCodePrefix P54482 FINISHED
Object CC LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CC | Statement: [CC, associatedSubdivisionCodePrefix, CC]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedSubdivisionCodePrefix
Context triple: [CC, associatedSubdivisionCodePrefix, CC]
  • A. associatedCountrySubdivisionCode
    Indicates the specific administrative region or subdivision code within a country that is linked to or relevant for the given entity.
  • B. associatedWithSubdivision
    Indicates that one entity has a connection or linkage to a specific administrative or organizational subdivision.
  • C. hasSubdivisionCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific code identifying one of its internal subdivisions (such as a state, province, or region).
  • D. hasSubdivisionCodePart chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s subdivision code includes or is composed of the referenced code segment or component.
  • E. primarySubdivisionOf
    Indicates that one administrative or territorial unit is the main first-level subdivision within a larger political or geographic entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f2da22c8190a50942ac20af70e8 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f8dc7d288190a0d08ba704cc3fc2 completed March 27, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4dc485c819080da13e3b7f4f08f completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:50 p.m.