Triple

T7541391
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Runway 5 E178282 entity
Predicate hasMagneticHeadingRangeInDegrees P77719 FINISHED
Object 046–055 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 046–055 | Statement: [Runway 5, hasMagneticHeadingRangeInDegrees, 046–055]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMagneticHeadingRangeInDegrees
Context triple: [Runway 5, hasMagneticHeadingRangeInDegrees, 046–055]
  • A. hasMagneticHeading
    Indicates the directional orientation of an entity relative to magnetic north, typically expressed as a magnetic compass bearing.
  • B. hasReciprocalMagneticHeadingApprox
    Indicates that two entities have magnetic headings that are approximately reciprocal (differing by about 180 degrees from each other).
  • C. hasMagneticMoment
    Indicates that an entity possesses a magnetic moment, characterizing the strength and orientation of its magnetism.
  • D. magneticFieldStrength
    Indicates the intensity or magnitude of a magnetic field associated with an entity or at a specific location.
  • E. hasApproximateHeading
    Indicates that one entity’s directional heading is approximately the same as another’s, within a specified tolerance.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f2be3888190a6667a27f8f195e9 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f8750f80819088ddfb7a5580b5df completed March 27, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4d8eedc81908c1ae421e0e63798 completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f5cea2748190afd607ef93e8d66c completed March 27, 2026, 9:25 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:48 p.m.