Triple
T752879
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shelby County v. Holder |
E15487
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSectionInvolved |
P19101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 |
E8555
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 | Statement: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasSectionInvolved, Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Context triple: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasSectionInvolved, Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
-
A.
Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1982
The Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1982 were U.S. federal legislative changes that strengthened and extended protections against racial discrimination in voting, including by renewing key provisions and clarifying standards for proving discriminatory effects.
-
B.
Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1975
The Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1975 were U.S. federal legislative changes that expanded and strengthened voting rights protections, notably by extending coverage to language minorities and renewing key provisions of the original Voting Rights Act.
-
C.
Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
The Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970 were U.S. federal legislative changes that expanded and strengthened protections against racial discrimination in voting, including temporarily lowering the voting age to 18 in federal elections and extending key enforcement provisions of the original Voting Rights Act.
-
D.
Voting Rights Act of 1965
chosen
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark U.S. federal law that outlawed discriminatory voting practices and enforced African Americans’ right to vote, especially in the South.
-
E.
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin in places of public accommodation such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSectionInvolved Context triple: [Shelby County v. Holder, hasSectionInvolved, Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
-
A.
hasSect
Indicates that an entity includes, contains, or is associated with a particular sect or subgroup within a larger religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
B.
hasSectionCount
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific number of sections it contains or comprises.
-
C.
hasLowLevelSection
Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a subordinate or lower-level section within a larger hierarchical structure.
-
D.
isSectionNumber
Indicates that one entity is the section number identifier associated with another entity, typically within a structured document or text.
-
E.
involvedBranch
Indicates that a particular branch (such as a location, division, or sub-unit) participates in, is associated with, or plays a role in the referenced event, process, or relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493599a0081908da65f3407af1ef2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a64d7d2c8190a6059adcb8fbd34f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a654eae9608190af3b410ecc041660 |
completed | March 3, 2026, 3:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a501c4cc81908de6d63e3d4f60d7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a5bed20c81909ecc28bf42594e72 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.