Triple
T7521770
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Palacio del Infantado |
E177785
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStyleCombination |
P50934
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gothic and Mudéjar elements |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gothic and Mudéjar elements | Statement: [Palacio del Infantado, hasStyleCombination, Gothic and Mudéjar elements]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStyleCombination Context triple: [Palacio del Infantado, hasStyleCombination, Gothic and Mudéjar elements]
-
A.
hasStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
B.
styleCombination
chosen
Indicates a relationship where multiple styles are combined or coordinated to form a unified stylistic configuration or presentation.
-
C.
hasSubstyle
Indicates that one style is a more specific or subordinate variant of another style within a hierarchical style structure.
-
D.
hasContractStyle
Indicates that one entity is associated with or characterized by a particular contract style or contractual format.
-
E.
hasComb
Indicates that an entity possesses or is equipped with a comb.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f29bf3081909a146aec7755f185 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f7c3c4c08190ad418978afcc98ec |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f4d6bb808190bdd04499fd3bceb6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:46 p.m.