Triple

T7498111
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mubahala E177183 entity
Predicate hasDoctrinalUse P41967 FINISHED
Object argument in Muslim–Christian theological debates LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: argument in Muslim–Christian theological debates | Statement: [Mubahala, hasDoctrinalUse, argument in Muslim–Christian theological debates]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDoctrinalUse
Context triple: [Mubahala, hasDoctrinalUse, argument in Muslim–Christian theological debates]
  • A. hasDoctrinalCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific doctrinal feature, quality, or attribute within a belief or teaching system.
  • B. hasDoctrinalBasis
    Indicates that one concept, claim, or practice is grounded in, supported by, or derived from a specific doctrine or set of doctrines.
  • C. hasDoctrinalImplication
    Indicates that one concept, statement, or action carries consequences or significance for a system of beliefs, teachings, or doctrines.
  • D. doctrinalStatus
    Indicates the formal standing or classification of a belief, teaching, or doctrine within a particular religious or ideological system.
  • E. isRelevantToDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that something has a meaningful connection or applicability to a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f2696688190915a8458f2398211 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f81b431481908214b69c6c8d83bc completed March 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4d266d88190982cf5d2ee2e9564 completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:44 p.m.