Triple

T7492222
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Regional Bell Operating Companies E177031 entity
Predicate legalBasis P125 FINISHED
Object United States v. AT&T Corp. antitrust case E177030 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. AT&T Corp. antitrust case | Statement: [Regional Bell Operating Companies, legalBasis, United States v. AT&T Corp. antitrust case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. AT&T Corp. antitrust case
Context triple: [Regional Bell Operating Companies, legalBasis, United States v. AT&T Corp. antitrust case]
  • A. United States v. AT&T chosen
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • B. MCI v. AT&T
    MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
  • C. United States v. Microsoft Corp.
    United States v. Microsoft Corp. was a major U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the late 1990s and early 2000s that challenged Microsoft's dominance in the personal computer operating systems market, particularly its practices related to bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
  • D. AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution
    AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution refers to the outcome of the 1913 Kingsbury Commitment, which allowed AT&T to continue operating as a dominant telecommunications company under agreed regulatory constraints instead of being broken up at that time.
  • E. antitrust case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
    The antitrust case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States was a landmark 1911 U.S. Supreme Court decision that broke up John D. Rockefeller’s oil monopoly under the Sherman Antitrust Act, reshaping American corporate and competition law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f2583808190bd1a4936c42a5815 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f5784c908190b701959daf082625 completed March 27, 2026, 9:24 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c84600d65481908518bc0d7ffcb373 completed March 28, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.