Triple
T7489752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paris is well worth a Mass |
E176974
|
entity |
| Predicate | certaintyOfAttribution |
P20391
|
FINISHED |
| Object | disputed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputed | Statement: [Paris is well worth a Mass, certaintyOfAttribution, disputed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: certaintyOfAttribution Context triple: [Paris is well worth a Mass, certaintyOfAttribution, disputed]
-
A.
hasCertainty
Indicates that a statement, belief, or relationship is associated with a specific level or degree of confidence or surety.
-
B.
questionedAttribution
chosen
Indicates that the correctness or source of an attribution between entities is being challenged or called into doubt.
-
C.
hasUncertainty
Indicates that the relationship or value is associated with some level or type of uncertainty rather than being fully definite or precise.
-
D.
narrativeCertainty
Indicates the degree of confidence or definitiveness with which a narrative, statement, or account is presented as true or reliable.
-
E.
degreeOfAttestation
Indicates the extent or level to which something (such as a claim, form, or document) is supported, verified, or confirmed by evidence or authoritative sources.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f2583808190bd1a4936c42a5815 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f55abcd481909e42ca857fe46cd1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.