Triple
T7489725
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | François Ravaillac |
E176973
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfCrimeCommitted |
P7957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | political assassination |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political assassination | Statement: [François Ravaillac, typeOfCrimeCommitted, political assassination]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCrimeCommitted Context triple: [François Ravaillac, typeOfCrimeCommitted, political assassination]
-
A.
crimeType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of the crime associated with an event or entity.
-
B.
committedCrime
Indicates that an entity has carried out or been responsible for a criminal act or offense.
-
C.
targetOfCrime
Indicates that the subject is the person, organization, or entity against whom the referenced crime is committed.
-
D.
roleInCrime
Indicates the specific function, responsibility, or participation an entity has within the commission of a particular crime.
-
E.
convictedOf
Indicates that a person or entity has been found guilty of committing a specified offense or crime through a formal legal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f55abcd481909e42ca857fe46cd1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.