Triple

T7486380
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce E176891 entity
Predicate priorHistory P3444 FINISHED
Object Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 424 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1988) E176891 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 424 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1988) | Statement: [Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, priorHistory, Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 424 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1988)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 424 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1988)
Context triple: [Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, priorHistory, Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 424 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. 1988)]
  • A. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce chosen
    Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
  • B. Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting
    Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld an Arizona law allowing the state to revoke business licenses of employers who knowingly hire unauthorized immigrants, ruling that it was not preempted by federal immigration law.
  • C. Michigan v. Tucker
    Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
  • D. Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989)
    Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that neither a State nor its officials acting in their official capacities are “persons” subject to damages liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  • E. 17th Circuit Court of Michigan
    The 17th Circuit Court of Michigan is a state trial court of general jurisdiction serving Kent County, handling major civil and criminal cases as well as family and other circuit-level matters.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 completed March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c83c68bcf081908a2c280152d887f0 completed March 28, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.